Wednesday November 30, 2016
08:42 AM GMT+8


More stories

Supporters of the 'NYC Revolution Club' burn the US flag outside the Trump International Hotel and Tower in New York, U.S., November 29, 2016. — Reuters picSupporters of the 'NYC Revolution Club' burn the US flag outside the Trump International Hotel and Tower in New York, U.S., November 29, 2016. — Reuters picWASHINGTON, Nov 30 — President-elect Donald Trump’s latest proposal, to jail anyone who burns the American flag, faced a backlash from much of political Washington today, including from within his Republican Party.

“Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag,” Trump posted on Twitter yesterday.

“If they do, there must be consequences — perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest succinctly noted that “the freedom that we all have to express ourselves in the way that we choose” is protected under the US Constitution.

“The vast majority of Americans, myself included, find the burning of the flag offensive, but we have a responsibility as a country to carefully protect our rights,” Earnest said.

Stressing there was “bipartisan sentiment” on the sanctity of such rights, President Barack Obama’s spokesman also said such rights applied to “being able to say whatever you want on Twitter,” a sly reference to Trump’s unprecedented use of social media to bash opponents and the press. 

The reasons for Trump’s tweet, coming as it did amid heightened speculation about who he will pick for key cabinet posts including secretary of state, were difficult to decipher.

He received polite but firm pushback from his allies in Congress.

“That activity is a protected First Amendment right, a form of unpleasant speech, and in this country we have a long tradition of respecting unpleasant speech,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters when asked about Trump’s suggestion.

“I happen to support the Supreme Court decision on that matter.”

Other Republican lawmakers shared McConnell’s view.

The US Supreme Court ruled that burning an American flag was permissible in the name of freedom of expression.

In 2012, conservative justice Antonin Scalia explained the importance of differentiating between personal opinions and respect for the law.

“If I were king, I would not allow people to go about burning the American flag,” said Scalia, who died early this year.

“However, we have a First Amendment which says that the right of free speech shall not be abridged, and it is addressed in particular to speech critical of the government.

“I mean, that was the main kind of speech that tyrants would seek to suppress.”

The right is confined not just to words spoken or written.

“Burning the flag is a form of expression,” Scalia said.

Theodore Boutrous, a constitutional law expert, told AFP that Scalia had joined the majority in the appeals case of Texas v. Johnson, which held “unequivocally” that flag burning is protected speech under the First Amendment.

“The Constitution protects all Americans, even those who act like they hold it in contempt,” Boutrous said. — AFP